Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen.
Identifieur interne : 004D86 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004D85; suivant : 004D87Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen.
Auteurs : R L Lindroth [États-Unis] ; J M Scriber [États-Unis] ; M T S. Hsia [États-Unis]Source :
- Oecologia [ 1432-1939 ] ; 1986.
Abstract
Two subspecies of the eastern tiger swallowtail butterfly, Papilio glaucus, exhibit reciprocal inabilities to survive and grow on each other's preferred foodplant. P. g. canadensis R. & J. performs well on quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) but not on tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera L.); P. g. glaucus L. performs well on tulip tree but not on quaking aspen. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that secondary metabolites in tulip tree and quaking aspen are responsible for these differential utilization abilities. We extracted and fractionated leaf constituents into different chemical classes, applied them to a mutually acceptable diet (black cherry, Prunus serotina, leaves), and bioassayed them against neonate larvae (survival) and penultimate instar larvae (survival, growth, digestibility and conversion efficiencies). For each plant species, one fraction in particular showed activity against the unadapted subspecies. One tulip tree fraction dramatically reduced survival of P. g. canadensis neonates, and reduced consumption rates, growth rates, and ECI's of fourth instar larvae. The tulip tree constituents most likely responsible for these effects are sesquiterpene lactones. One quaking aspen fraction greatly lowered survival of P. g. glaucus neonates, and decreased survival, consumption rates, growth rates and ECD's of fourth instar larvae. The compounds responsible for these results are probably simple phenols or phenolic glycosides. Surprisingly, P. g. glaucus and P. g. canadensis showed slightly poorer performance on the active tulip tree and quaking aspen fractions, respectively, indicating that even adapted insects incur a metabolic cost in the processing of their host's phytochemicals.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00377106
PubMed: 28311282
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen.</title><author><name sortKey="Lindroth, R L" sort="Lindroth, R L" uniqKey="Lindroth R" first="R L" last="Lindroth">R L Lindroth</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Wisconsin</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Scriber, J M" sort="Scriber, J M" uniqKey="Scriber J" first="J M" last="Scriber">J M Scriber</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Wisconsin</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hsia, M T S" sort="Hsia, M T S" uniqKey="Hsia M" first="M T S" last="Hsia">M T S. Hsia</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Wisconsin</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1986">1986</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28311282</idno><idno type="pmid">28311282</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00377106</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">004D80</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004D80</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004D80</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">004D80</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004D80</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen.</title><author><name sortKey="Lindroth, R L" sort="Lindroth, R L" uniqKey="Lindroth R" first="R L" last="Lindroth">R L Lindroth</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Wisconsin</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Scriber, J M" sort="Scriber, J M" uniqKey="Scriber J" first="J M" last="Scriber">J M Scriber</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Wisconsin</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hsia, M T S" sort="Hsia, M T S" uniqKey="Hsia M" first="M T S" last="Hsia">M T S. Hsia</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Wisconsin</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oecologia</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno><imprint><date when="1986" type="published">1986</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Two subspecies of the eastern tiger swallowtail butterfly, Papilio glaucus, exhibit reciprocal inabilities to survive and grow on each other's preferred foodplant. P. g. canadensis R. & J. performs well on quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) but not on tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera L.); P. g. glaucus L. performs well on tulip tree but not on quaking aspen. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that secondary metabolites in tulip tree and quaking aspen are responsible for these differential utilization abilities. We extracted and fractionated leaf constituents into different chemical classes, applied them to a mutually acceptable diet (black cherry, Prunus serotina, leaves), and bioassayed them against neonate larvae (survival) and penultimate instar larvae (survival, growth, digestibility and conversion efficiencies). For each plant species, one fraction in particular showed activity against the unadapted subspecies. One tulip tree fraction dramatically reduced survival of P. g. canadensis neonates, and reduced consumption rates, growth rates, and ECI's of fourth instar larvae. The tulip tree constituents most likely responsible for these effects are sesquiterpene lactones. One quaking aspen fraction greatly lowered survival of P. g. glaucus neonates, and decreased survival, consumption rates, growth rates and ECD's of fourth instar larvae. The compounds responsible for these results are probably simple phenols or phenolic glycosides. Surprisingly, P. g. glaucus and P. g. canadensis showed slightly poorer performance on the active tulip tree and quaking aspen fractions, respectively, indicating that even adapted insects incur a metabolic cost in the processing of their host's phytochemicals.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28311282</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1939</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>70</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1986</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Oecologia</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oecologia</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>13-19</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/BF00377106</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Two subspecies of the eastern tiger swallowtail butterfly, Papilio glaucus, exhibit reciprocal inabilities to survive and grow on each other's preferred foodplant. P. g. canadensis R. & J. performs well on quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) but not on tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera L.); P. g. glaucus L. performs well on tulip tree but not on quaking aspen. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that secondary metabolites in tulip tree and quaking aspen are responsible for these differential utilization abilities. We extracted and fractionated leaf constituents into different chemical classes, applied them to a mutually acceptable diet (black cherry, Prunus serotina, leaves), and bioassayed them against neonate larvae (survival) and penultimate instar larvae (survival, growth, digestibility and conversion efficiencies). For each plant species, one fraction in particular showed activity against the unadapted subspecies. One tulip tree fraction dramatically reduced survival of P. g. canadensis neonates, and reduced consumption rates, growth rates, and ECI's of fourth instar larvae. The tulip tree constituents most likely responsible for these effects are sesquiterpene lactones. One quaking aspen fraction greatly lowered survival of P. g. glaucus neonates, and decreased survival, consumption rates, growth rates and ECD's of fourth instar larvae. The compounds responsible for these results are probably simple phenols or phenolic glycosides. Surprisingly, P. g. glaucus and P. g. canadensis showed slightly poorer performance on the active tulip tree and quaking aspen fractions, respectively, indicating that even adapted insects incur a metabolic cost in the processing of their host's phytochemicals.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lindroth</LastName><ForeName>R L</ForeName><Initials>RL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scriber</LastName><ForeName>J M</ForeName><Initials>JM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hsia</LastName><ForeName>M T S</ForeName><Initials>MT</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Oecologia</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0150372</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0029-8549</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Bioassays</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Liriodendron tulipifera</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Nutritional indices</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Papilio glaucus</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Populus tremuloides</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Secondary compounds</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>1986</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>02</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1986</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1986</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28311282</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/BF00377106</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/BF00377106</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1984 Mar;10(3):499-520</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24318555</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1983 Jan;37(1):163-179</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28568024</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1984 Apr;62(1):26-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28310733</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1978 Aug 25;201(4357):745-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17750235</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1981 Feb 27;211(4485):887-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17819016</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1985 Aug;67(1):1-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28309837</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1985 Feb;65(3):319-323</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28310435</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1985 Aug;67(1):52-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28309845</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1985 Aug 16;229(4714):649-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17739376</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1977 Sep;28(3):269-287</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28309252</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Wisconsin</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Wisconsin"><name sortKey="Lindroth, R L" sort="Lindroth, R L" uniqKey="Lindroth R" first="R L" last="Lindroth">R L Lindroth</name></region><name sortKey="Hsia, M T S" sort="Hsia, M T S" uniqKey="Hsia M" first="M T S" last="Hsia">M T S. Hsia</name><name sortKey="Scriber, J M" sort="Scriber, J M" uniqKey="Scriber J" first="J M" last="Scriber">J M Scriber</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004D86 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004D86 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28311282
|texte= Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28311282" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |